Stay informed
Sign up for VentnorBlog's newsletter simply by entering your email address below and it will be delivered free to your email every morning.

 

Author: Sal

St Joseph’s: Planning Inspectorate Rejects Appeal For Roof Terrace

Tuesday, 26th August, 2008 at 12:45 pm, Isle of Wight

We know that lots of you have an interesting in planning on the Island, so here’s the latest on St Joseph’s in Ventnor - Ed.

Christopher Scott Apply For Roof Gardens at St Joseph'sIt was with great joy on Friday morning, that we received a letter from the Planning Inspectorate stating that they were refusing Michael Jennings’ appeal to use an unauthorised roof terrace at St Joseph’s, Ventnor.

As VB readers will know, the original planning permission stated that the flat roof could not be used as a garden space. Next Jennings put in an application to use it, which was refused by the case officer with the condition attached that the area should be filled in, so that it could not be used in the future.

It is the appeal against the decision to once again refuse use of the roof, made by the IW Council planning department, that was being considered by the Planning Inspectorate.

The Inspector stated that

This would, in my view, lead to an unacceptable loss of privacy for these neighbours and so harm their living conditions. This would be contrary to Policy D1 of the Isle of Wight Unitary Development Plan 1996 – 2011.

Thank goodness, sense prevailed.

But …
Unfortunately, what arrived on the same day as this refusal, was notice that Christopher Scott, who are now in charge of the site on behalf of the finance company Close Brothers, have submitted another application, this time to not only retain the increased height of the building that was built without permission, but to increase the height of the parapet roof even further. This will result in yet more daylight being blocked and will seek to avoid the previous IW planning condition, to fill in the flat roof.

Given Christopher Scott and Close Brothers are aware of the history of this and know of the clear concerns about privacy, this, in our view, shows a surprising and disappointing disregard of the neighbouring properties.

Readers of VentnorBlog can look forward to hearing more on this subject over the next week or so.

Planning, Ventnor


Email This Story To A Friend Email This Story To A Friend
 


One Response to “St Joseph’s: Planning Inspectorate Rejects Appeal For Roof Terrace”

  1. Bertie Says:

    This is absolutely par for the course. Along with Jennings other “development” I have been keeping an eye on this one also. It looks like Gayler has submitted this latest application, judging by the barely legible writing.
    I downloaded a copy of the Land Registry entry on 11 August and that shows only one flat, No 2, has been sold, yet Webb has had a SOLD sign up in one of the “villas” for a few weeks. Interesting.
    The “Proprietor” is named as St. Josephs Ventnor Properties Ltd. Unit 4 Ventnor Industrial Estate, Old Station Rd., yet on the application, the address for St Josephs Ventnor Properties Ltd. is given as Site office, St. Josephs, 29 Madeira Rd. At Companies House St. Josephs Ventnor Properties Ltd No.5676797, registered address is 3A Undercliff Gardens, Ventnor, which hopefully will not be the registered address much longer.
    Theres never a dull moment with old Mickey about.

What's your view?

We all love to read your comments, just consider that they can be read by people of all ages, so please avoid them being offensive, or over-personal.

If wouldn't say it in front of your Gran, please don't post it.

Tip: If you're feeling incensed about a comment and are thinking of bashing out a reply, go and make yourself a cup of something hot, take a deep breath and then reply. You're less likely to write something that you regret later.

Even if you see your name and email address below, please don't be concerned as your email address cannot be seen publicly.