<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OFT Deleted Email From Public On Ferry Consultation UPDATED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ventnorblog.com/2009/06/12/oft-deleted-email-from-public-on-ferry-consultation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ventnorblog.com/2009/06/12/oft-deleted-email-from-public-on-ferry-consultation/</link>
	<description>VentnorBlog - It&#039;s not just about Ventnor! News from the Isle of Wight.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:21:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adrian nicholas</title>
		<link>http://ventnorblog.com/2009/06/12/oft-deleted-email-from-public-on-ferry-consultation/#comment-71327</link>
		<dc:creator>adrian nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventnorblog.com/?p=22461#comment-71327</guid>
		<description>if they &#039;deleted&#039; the emails- then surely without finding them then they can&#039;t call that a full public consultation either, part-yes.
but &#039;part&#039; does not constitue a full public consultation and given the irreleguarities an extended or new period should called given the title of the commision concerned.
 Can&#039;t help feeling that we are not being told a lot of relevant facts and reasons on this and that,being realistic, there may be other ,economic strategy and factors 
 that we are not privy to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if they &#8216;deleted&#8217; the emails- then surely without finding them then they can&#8217;t call that a full public consultation either, part-yes.<br />
but &#8216;part&#8217; does not constitue a full public consultation and given the irreleguarities an extended or new period should called given the title of the commision concerned.<br />
 Can&#8217;t help feeling that we are not being told a lot of relevant facts and reasons on this and that,being realistic, there may be other ,economic strategy and factors<br />
 that we are not privy to?
<p align="right"><small><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://ventnorblog.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=71327', 400, 400)">(Report comment)</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClaireK</title>
		<link>http://ventnorblog.com/2009/06/12/oft-deleted-email-from-public-on-ferry-consultation/#comment-71299</link>
		<dc:creator>ClaireK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 02:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventnorblog.com/?p=22461#comment-71299</guid>
		<description>I wonder if they were paid to remove the e-mails?
As the system is so corrupt at present, it does make you think what forces are working against Andrew Turners attempt to get fairer prices for the Ferries. 
Hopefully Andrew Turners Office will have his e-mails still on file, but it&#039;s soul destroying when local people take the time and energy to have a say and as usual their thoughts are dismissed as in valid or trivial.
The only person who could deal with this issue would be the Lord Attorney, who can investigate to see if this due to corruption or just down right stupidity!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if they were paid to remove the e-mails?<br />
As the system is so corrupt at present, it does make you think what forces are working against Andrew Turners attempt to get fairer prices for the Ferries.<br />
Hopefully Andrew Turners Office will have his e-mails still on file, but it&#8217;s soul destroying when local people take the time and energy to have a say and as usual their thoughts are dismissed as in valid or trivial.<br />
The only person who could deal with this issue would be the Lord Attorney, who can investigate to see if this due to corruption or just down right stupidity!!
<p align="right"><small><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://ventnorblog.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=71299', 400, 400)">(Report comment)</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James P</title>
		<link>http://ventnorblog.com/2009/06/12/oft-deleted-email-from-public-on-ferry-consultation/#comment-71291</link>
		<dc:creator>James P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventnorblog.com/?p=22461#comment-71291</guid>
		<description>They have looked in the &#039;trash&#039; bin, I suppose?

That and the diametrically opposite recording of the CoC survey is ineptitude on a mind-boggling scale. One for Private Eye, I think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have looked in the &#8216;trash&#8217; bin, I suppose?</p>
<p>That and the diametrically opposite recording of the CoC survey is ineptitude on a mind-boggling scale. One for Private Eye, I think&#8230;
<p align="right"><small><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://ventnorblog.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=71291', 400, 400)">(Report comment)</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Bonney</title>
		<link>http://ventnorblog.com/2009/06/12/oft-deleted-email-from-public-on-ferry-consultation/#comment-71290</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Bonney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventnorblog.com/?p=22461#comment-71290</guid>
		<description>I did email them. I am stunned by their cavalier attitude, their ongoing failure to be seen to be building a portfolio of evidence and their disregard for public input. I am at a loss to understand how they have calculated that the entire island, including Andrew Turners office, contributed an estimated 10-15 emails in this time. Is anybody aware of any ombudsman that can be contacted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did email them. I am stunned by their cavalier attitude, their ongoing failure to be seen to be building a portfolio of evidence and their disregard for public input. I am at a loss to understand how they have calculated that the entire island, including Andrew Turners office, contributed an estimated 10-15 emails in this time. Is anybody aware of any ombudsman that can be contacted?
<p align="right"><small><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://ventnorblog.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=71290', 400, 400)">(Report comment)</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
