Find VentnorBlog on your Mobile - Twitter - Facebook
For daily email updates, just your email address:

 

Author: simon

Couthy Butts: Saga Explained (podcast)

Friday, 4th July, 2008 at 9:33 pm, Isle of Wight

Godshill, Planning, podcast

Couthy Butts Saga Explained (podcast)Have you read or heard about the Couthy Butts saga?

Here’s a brief summary – It’s a building that is thought to be over 250 years old and is the only example of a Georgian farm worker’s cottage on the whole of the Isle of Wight.

At the last planning meeting, on the recommendation of the planning officers, it was decided that it should be demolished and all of the materials removed from the site.

Very confusing.

Why would the council actively want to destroy a part of history, Island history? Perhaps the Planning Committee didn’t have all of the pertinent information available to them?

It’s a long and involved saga that has been running since 2001, so we sat down with Brian Harvey this week and he gave us the summary of the events up to date.

What jumped out, was that Mr Harvey has in the past reported two of the IW Council planning officers, Mr Pegram (reported to the ombudsman) and Mr Cornwell (reported to the head of the council), for malpractice.

These are the two same officers who were speaking at the most recent planning meeting, recommending that this unique, historic building be demolished.

At the very least this must be a conflict of interest.

It’s only 12 minutes long and well worth a listen …

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Related posts:


Email This Story To A Friend Email This Story To A Friend


7 Responses to “Couthy Butts: Saga Explained (podcast)”

  1. Click if you like this comment steve s
    says:

    Anything to say about this, Bertie?

    (Report comment)

  2. Click if you like this comment L Pinkerton
    says:

    Never cross a planning officer. They can say what they like.

    (Report comment)

  3. Click if you like this comment Bertie
    says:

    @ steve s. Yes, I have, but not on here.
    @ Pinkie. That’s where you are wrong.

    (Report comment)

  4. Click if you like this comment L Pinkerton
    says:

    Bertie, I too cannot publish detail here. It’s been nice talking to you, Pinkie.

    (Report comment)

  5. Click if you like this comment Bertie
    says:

    “I too cannot publish detail here.” What?
    If you (or anyone else) has anything useful to add, email it to the Blog, providing it is fact, not rumour.
    “Never cross a planning officer”
    These bozos are not the Mafia, Pinkie.
    “It’s been nice talking to you,”
    Does that mean our relationship is over? Blink!

    (Report comment)

  6. Click if you like this comment L Pinkerton
    says:

    Bertie, ignoring the rest I shall be delighted to exchange views with you in future, Pinkie.

    (Report comment)

  7. Click if you like this comment steve s
    says:

    Bertie, you’ve felt free to comment on this subject, on this forum in the past. I’m surprised to see that you are uncomfortable about responding to Simon’s interview with Brian Harvey.
    I share Simon’s concern about a potential conflict of interest, don’t you?

    (Report comment)

What is your view?

Comment guidance

*** You're now able to reply directly to someone's comment, find out how ***

We all love to read your comments - just consider that they can be read by people of all ages, so please avoid them being offensive, or over-personal.

If wouldn't say it in front of your Gran, please don't post it.

Tip: If you're feeling incensed about a comment and are thinking of bashing out a reply, go and make yourself a cup of something hot, take a deep breath and then reply. You're less likely to write something that you regret later.

Don't worry - even if you see your name and email address below, please don't be concerned. Your email address cannot be seen publicly.