Find VentnorBlog on your Mobile - Twitter - Facebook
For daily email updates, just your email address:

 

Author: Sal

£7m ‘Loss’ Of Funding: Who’s Telling The Truth?

Wednesday, 12th March, 2008 at 12:28 pm, Isle of Wight

Education, School Reform

Last week we reported Loss Of £7m Govt Funding To Schools Not True. In order to provide balanced reporting, we requested a statement from the Council, which raised further questions for us.

We raised our concerns with the press office and in an unofficial statement, a member of the press office stated that we were getting our figures mixed up and that David Pugh has never said that the loss of £7m related to surplus places.

We were a little perturbed to hear this coming out from the press office, as many people that we had spoken to thought that David Pugh had stated many times in public and on IW Radio that if we don’t close primary schools to reduce surplus school places, we will lose £7 million funding from the government.

Naturally our email response was …

You’re right, it is confusing. Confusing as to where the truth in this is.

You state that the council has not said it will ‘lose’ seven million in funding as a result of surplus places.

On 28 Jan, in front of a public audience at Ventnor Middle, David Pugh said

“We heard Steve refer of (sic) the £10 million that we used to have for improving our school buildings on the Isle of Wight receive, that’s gone down to a £3m basic grant.

To get back any of that money back and to get additional funding to do even the most basic maintenance of school buildings, we need to meet very strict criteria, that is to reduce our surplus places in our schools from 30% to less 10%.”

Directly linking the loss of £7 million, with the reduction in school places.

Listen for yourself

Which is correct?

We sent this on Friday at 1:22pm. To date, despite many email reminders, we have still not had an official reply to our simple question.

What they have said is that they have a statement, but it has to be signed off (this was yesterday). Nearly three hours ago we got another delaying email, “Apologies on the delay, but I am just awaiting one final email from an officer before I can send this to you.” Well, we don’t feel that this important matter can wait any longer.

We’re not sure why it is taking so long for the press office to get a response to us. Surely the answer would be either, sorry the press office got it wrong, or David Pugh got it wrong.

As to why, by late Wednesday lunchtime — nearly five days later — have we still not received answer to clear up this simple ‘misunderstanding’?

If you weren’t able to go along to the public meetings or tune into IW Radio and hear for yourself David Pugh stating that unless the council tackle surplus places they will lose £7m, click on the play button below and listen now (it a couple of mins).

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

UPDATE: Five minutes in to the show,we ‘ve been told that David Pugh WON’T be on, despite 10 minutes ago, Dyke saying he would be. Make up your own mind as to why he’s not open for public questioning.

Related posts:


Email This Story To A Friend Email This Story To A Friend


3 Responses to “£7m ‘Loss’ Of Funding: Who’s Telling The Truth?”

  1. Click if you like this comment Luigi
    says:

    So either David Pugh wasn’t telling the truth or he didn’t understand the facts presented to him? It’s quite worrying and somewhat sloppy considering he’s the leader of the council – but I’d probably put it down due a lack of experience? If the £7m statement regarding surplus places isn’t an issue any more, could someone please let me know the main reason for closing these schools again?

    (Report comment)

  2. [...] related posts -Gardeners Question Time Comes To Ventnor£7m ‘Loss’ Of Funding: Who’s Telling The Truth?Island Euro MP Talks on Climate ChangeSwitch 45/Bestival CompBill Murphy, Head of Planning To Answer [...]

    (Report comment)

  3. Click if you like this comment lisa
    says:

    This is interesting after asking this question many times in many emails. We eventually got a response. One from a local councillor who we asked to ask (as we were not getting a response) and one from Mr Wells himself.

    How much of the 7m is dependant on reducing surplus places?

    Mr Well’s reply “As far as we are aware all of it but we are awaiting word from the department because the government are sending out confused messages at the moment with the statement from the Minister last week. We have asked for clarification. ”

    Local councillors reply “I can answer your first question. I have been advised that as far as we are aware all of the 7k but we are waiting for the department to confirm this as government are sending out confused messages at the moment with the statement from the Minister last week. We have asked for clarification.”
    All replies copied from emails.

    NOW WE KNOW THAT THIS MONEY IS NOT DEPENDANT ON REDUCING SURPLUS PLACES. SURELY THE MATRIX AND ITS WEIGHTING SHOULD BE CHANGED. SCHOOLS ARE GETTING 3x POINTS FOR AN ISSUE THAT ACCORDING TO JIM KNIGHT IS NOT CRUCIAL.

    (Report comment)

What is your view?

Comment guidance

*** You're now able to reply directly to someone's comment, find out how ***

We all love to read your comments - just consider that they can be read by people of all ages, so please avoid them being offensive, or over-personal.

If wouldn't say it in front of your Gran, please don't post it.

Tip: If you're feeling incensed about a comment and are thinking of bashing out a reply, go and make yourself a cup of something hot, take a deep breath and then reply. You're less likely to write something that you regret later.

Don't worry - even if you see your name and email address below, please don't be concerned. Your email address cannot be seen publicly.